Exact(1)
We completed 100 paired telephone chronic headache classification interviews and 18 participants attended the self-management intervention.
Similar(59)
Participants received a chronic headache classification interview with a specially trained nurse and had a second interview with a doctor specialised in headache.
As part of the programme we have conducted a feasibility study to 1. Develop and test strategies for recruiting participants with chronic headache from primary care 2. Validate a telephone classification interview that can be used by a non-headache specialist to classify chronic headache disorders 3. Pilot a group education and self- management intervention for chronic headache.
Interviews with the caregiver and analyses of CPS records will be rated using the Maltreatment Classification System (MCS) [ 143] – a highly accurate, comprehensive, widely used and validated standardized system to evaluate maltreatment events reported in CPS records and caregiver interviews, based on the Maternal Maltreatment Classification Interview (MMCI) [ 144].
Our biggest challenges were being able to contact participants for eligibility and classification telephone interviews and delivering the group intervention at times convenient for a largely working population.
In fact, there was no disagreement among raters in the communication format classification of interviews.
Analysis will follow accepted norms for systematic classification of interview data.
GPs'speech was classified using nine main categories derived from the Verona medical interview classification system (VR-MICS/D).
Re-interviews were conducted by staff who were independent of the clinic where data was collected and blinded to the original interview result; none showed any discrepancy in treatment history classification to the original interviews.
Concern about precision and uncertainty in the modelled data was a primary theme regarding data classification in both the interviews and the surveys.
The one student who had a conclusive classification from the clinical interviews that did not match the classification based on the written assessment showed strong indications of ENS during the interview but was classified as aTNS based on the written assessment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com