Sentence examples for classical argument for from inspiring English sources

This is the classical argument for the backwards induction solution.

The classical argument for backwards induction implicitly assumes that at each stage of the game, the agents discount the preceding moves as strategically irrelevant.

A standard classical argument for tackling the boundary value problem for elliptic partial differential equations is based on reformulating the equation as an integral equation by using a Green's function and then invoking the theory of integral equations.

As we have seen, given common knowledge of the game and of rationality, forward induction reasoning can lead the agents to an apparent contradiction: The classical argument for backwards induction is predicated on what agents predict they would do at nodes in the tree that are never reached.

Results for multiple pile-ups do not support classical arguments for the Hall Petch relationship.

In this context, classical arguments for one-dimensional Markov diffusion processes such as Feller's tests or comparison theorems cannot be used to show that the processes do not exit from ([0,1]).

If you diminish the implications of religious experience and have a high standard regarding the burden of proof for any sort of religious outlook, then it is highly likely that the classical arguments for God's existence will not be persuasive.

Both philosophers undermined the metaphysical basis of natural theology and criticized classical arguments for the existence of God.

For instance, the classical argument that deep oceans became oxidized 1,800 million years ago is based principally on the disappearance of banded iron formations in the stratigraphic record (Johnson et al. 1997; Rue and Bruland 1995).

The emphasis on language as the eminent medium for the representation of human freedom reproduces a classical argument that is already at the heart of Hegel's aesthetics (a fact that the existentialists are fully aware of [Sartre 1948a, 5]).

The Classical Argument therefore seems to have either implausibly strong premises, a problematic inference, or both.