Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Two 7th and two 8th grade classes were randomly assigned as experimental (CT-integrated instruction), or comparison (traditional instruction) groups.
Female high school participants from three classes were randomly assigned to the three groups (C, n = 31; E1, n = 20; E2, n = 37).
Four classes were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) online paper; (2) paper online; (3) online online; and (4) paper paper.
In each school, two classes were randomly assigned intact to the experimental group (n=48) and the other was the control group (n=38).
The students in these three classes were randomly assigned to two conditions: animation prior to responding to osmosis survey and animation after responding to osmosis survey.
168 students from 10 classes were randomly assigned to either the high-structured condition (teacher interventions on group level and on class level) or the low-structured condition (only teacher interventions on group level).
Similar(50)
One of these classes was randomly assigned as experimental group and instructed by means of PBL, whereas the other class was assigned as control group and instructed by means of traditionally designed instruction.
The students in each class were randomly assigned to two conditions: Visualization Before (VB students view the DCVs prior to responding to the osmosis knowledge assessment, and Visualization After (VA)—students respond to the assessment and then view the DCVs.
The students of each class were randomly assigned and screened by the four examiners.
Students in a given class were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups for participation in three chemistry lessons that incorporated use of Chemation as a tool to support their learning.
Each class was randomly assigned to one of four groups, and three groups randomly received MSMs Group AA received MSMs during each problem-solving phase and at the conclusion of the problem-solving process; Group B received MSMs only during each problem-solving phase; Group C received MSMs after the conclusion of the problem-solving process.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com