noticing the regularities between utterances of "cow" and events concerning the cow, utterances of "bring" and bringing events, etc., the child understands that the word "cow" is linked with objects belonging the class of cows, etc.
One sub-school of Mīmāṃsakas (the Bhātta) claim that the meaning of "cow" is the universal cowhood, since sentences like "(The) cow is an animal", or injunctive laws like "Never kick a cow", say something about the entire class of cows, not about any one individual.
Intuitively, this is the distinction between groupings such as the class of cows or horses, which reflect natural divisions ("cut nature at the joints"), and those such as the class of Cabinet Ministers or the class of endangered species, which reflect anthropocentric concerns.
In the model for hygiene-related lesions, the intra-class correlation coefficient of cows within herd was 0.16 and that of trimmings within cows was 0.29.
In the model for laminitis-related lesion, the intra-class correlation coefficient of cows within herd was 0.20 and that of trimmings within cows was 0.28.
The intra-class correlation coefficient of cows within herd was 0.21 and that of trimmings within cow was 0.34, indicating that clustering of observations might affect the standard errors of the estimates.
The thought is that in order to understand the exclusion class of non-cows, we have to first have an idea that some particulars are cows.
The reason is that these classes are created from a variety of creatures, for example, the animal class includes sounds of cow, elephant, hippo, hyena, wolf, sheep, horse, cat and donkey, which are very diverse in their nature.
Herds were stratified according to number of cows into five classes: 20-49, 50-99, 100-199, 200-399 and > 400 cows.
Herd size was included as a factor either from non-transformed number of cows and following distribution of herds in 7 herd classes with more than 25 herds per class.
