We take the study of organizational inequality to a rapidly transforming society, where status and class asymmetries are in flux and the subject of profuse commentary as well as sharp contestation.
Analyzing whole-genome sequences of 590 tumors from 14 different cancer types, we reveal widespread asymmetries across mutagenic processes, with transcriptional ("T-class") asymmetry dominating UV-, smoking-, and liver-cancer-associated mutations and replicative ("R-class") asymmetry dominating POLE-, andBEC-, and MSI-associated mutations.
Two classes of asymmetry are considered: irregular domain shapes that cannot be treated by analytical means, and variation of the boundary condition along the boundary.
This article describes the complex dental treatment of a 43-year-old man with skeletal Class II, mandibular asymmetry, severe brachyfacial pattern, Class II Division 2, canting of the occlusal plane, and an increased curve of Spee.
These causal orientation methods aim to solve the problem of statistical indistinguishability of graphs in the Markov equivalence class by exploiting asymmetries in the shapes of the conditional probability densities and without requiring randomized experiments.
A study by Sievers and colleagues using CBCT imaging showed minor asymmetries in Class I and Class II patients using an asymmetry index (AI), a mathematical derivation which combined measurements from each landmark to the x-, y-, and z-planes [26].
Indeed, the observed mean asymmetry in classes of gene families with singleton Ka > 0.1 is consistent with reasonable assumptions about such heterogeneity.
This study included 21 patients with skeletal class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry.
This study examined two patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion with facial asymmetry who underwent USSRO for a mandibular setback.
Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was used to investigate which skeletodental factors are related to chin point deviation of facial asymmetry in skeletal class III malocclusion (SCIII) patients.
The 3D measurements of the length and angle of the midfacial, mandibular, and cranial bases by Baek et al. showed that menton deviation was significantly correlated with ramal height differences between the two sides, leading the authors to conclude that greater growth of the ramus was one of the causes of asymmetry in skeletal class III patients [8].
