clashes to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "clashes to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers. Example: "The two teams often clash to determine the champion of the league."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

Yet there are many more questions and clashes to come.

The Economist

That's either a bluff or an honest assessment; in either case, expect larger clashes to come.

The New Yorker

Local ones based on the politics of identity use clashes to corral specific castes as supporters.

The Economist

This act quickly rippled across the mountainous country's sectarian patchwork, setting off clashes to the north and south.

The Economist

The students who left cited a range of problems, from personality clashes to an overemphasis on academic training over performance.

The New York Times - Arts

But one of the pleasures of "Everyday People" is the way it slips around predictable clashes to pursue subtler harmonies.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

It would be easy for even a small clash to get out of hand.

The Economist

Lancashire did give consideration last week to moving this clash to Liverpool.

The Guardian - Sport

They've even recorded a version of London Calling by the Clash to mark the event.

The Guardian - Sport

Luckily for us, it was just the kind of clash to be imprinted on folk memory.

The New York Times - Books

So maybe those sheep should have clashed to some chords by former Oasis's guitarist Bonehead.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "clashes to" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "clashes leading to" or "clashes resulting in".

Common error

A common mistake is to use the incorrect preposition after "clashes". Instead of "clashes to", use prepositions like "over" or "between" to show the subject of the conflict (e.g., "clashes over territory" or "clashes between factions").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "clashes to" functions as a prepositional phrase, but it is grammatically questionable. Based on Ludwig AI, this phrase is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "clashes to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI analysis confirms it lacks clarity and isn't a standard English expression. It's advisable to use alternatives like "clashes over", "clashes between", or more explicit phrases such as "conflicts leading to" or "disputes resulting in". Avoiding "clashes to" ensures clearer and more effective communication across various contexts, especially in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicts leading to

Replaces a less common phrasing with a more direct expression of causation.

disputes resulting in

Emphasizes the outcome of disagreements more explicitly.

collisions giving rise to

Uses a more vivid metaphor for conflicts and their consequences.

friction causing

Focuses on the underlying tension that produces conflict.

discord generating

Highlights the lack of harmony and its impact.

hostilities escalating into

Implies an increase in the intensity of the conflict.

contention sparking

Suggests a sudden and forceful beginning of conflict.

struggles culminating in

Highlights the end result of a drawn-out conflict.

rivalries producing

Emphasizes the competitive nature of the conflict's origin.

confrontations precipitating

Indicates that confrontations led directly and quickly to a certain result.

FAQs

How can I use "clashes" correctly in a sentence?

Use "clashes" with prepositions like "over", "between", or "with" to clearly indicate the subject and context of the conflict. For example, "clashes over resources" or "clashes between protesters and police" are grammatically sound.

What are some alternatives to "clashes to" that I can use?

Instead of "clashes to", you can use alternatives such as "conflicts leading to", "disputes resulting in", or "collisions giving rise to" to express the relationship between conflicts and their outcomes more clearly.

Is "clashes to" grammatically correct?

No, "clashes to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases like "clashes over", "clashes between", or "clashes that led to" for clarity and correctness.

What's the difference between "clashes over" and "clashes to"?

"Clashes over" correctly indicates the subject or reason for the conflict (e.g., "clashes over territory"). "Clashes to", however, is not a standard or grammatically accepted phrase in English.