Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
The task for Tamils is to prove his claim wrong.
While the industry has long claimed that one of the primary benefits of biometric templates is that original biometric signals acquired to enroll a data subject cannot be reconstructed from stored templates, several approaches [2, 3] have proven this claim wrong.
However, the FDA has stated that, "Wooden shelves or boards cannot be adequately cleaned and sanitized" which is where scientific research has proven that claim wrong.
Imagine this (not that you'd likely need to imagine it): Sally claims "The Bible says X". Joan, a non-Christian, finds Sally's claim wrong, and responds, "But doesn't the Bible also say Y?" This happens very frequently, and usually leads to a standstill.
Edwards' 2009 paper proved the claim wrong, and CDC Director Tom Frieden admitted in 2010 that his agency's earlier report "left room for misinterpretation and may have led some people to improperly minimize concerns about lead exposure and conclude that lead in the water had never been a problem".
Similar(55)
This is incompatible with Sellars's understanding of naturalism, and he claims it also gets the grammar of existence claims wrong.
Hirshberg's claim is wrong.
But this claim is wrong in many ways.
Turnbull's office said the claim was wrong.
It struck me that the claim was wrong.
The study's authors say that claim is wrong.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com