The phrase "claim at issue" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a claim in debate or dispute that is the main focus of attention. For example: "The court's decision centered on the claim at issue, namely that the contract was invalid."
It was a strikingly inclusive decision that both apologized for the past and, looking to the future, anchored the gay-rights claim at issue in the case firmly in the tradition of human rights at the broadest level.
Bennett cannot assume that his account implies that Skeeter kills Victor, since that is the very claim at issue.
The claim at issue for AI should simply be whether "the running computer creates understanding of Chinese".
Similarly for the dialectical level: the chief challenges arise from theories and observations that seemingly conflict with the claim at issue or with its supporting reasons.
By contrast, Cartwright favors a "pluralistic" account, according to which a variety of diverse criteria are relevant to whether a relationship is causal and which of these are most appropriate or important will depend on the causal claim at issue.
Lehman says Deutsche Bank more properly belongs in the classes of unsecured claims that cover intercompany claims, since that is the root of the claims at issue.
Given the size of the claims at issue and our strong defenses, we do not expect the ruling to impact the planned reorganization".
They say they can prove, for instance, that the inventor waited at least 23 years to begin pressing the claims at issue.
They say that they can prove, for instance, that the inventor waited at least 23 years to begin pressing the claims at issue.
If the different validity claims require different types of argumentation, then the relevant differences must emerge through a closer analysis of the ways the above aspects of argumentative practice adjust to different sorts of content, that is, the different validity claims at issue (cf. 2008, chap. 3).
I choose "at issue" deliberately.
