"civic integration" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the process of actively participating and adapting to the values, norms, and laws of a community or society. Example: The government has implemented new measures to promote civic integration among immigrants, including language classes and cultural orientation programs.
The government will therefore continue to devote special attention to youth and young people, civic integration and vulnerable neighborhoods in the big cities.
Presenting the issue of civic integration in such terms has proved counterproductive, not least because it has detracted from the real problems confronting these populations: unemployment, racial discrimination and educational underachievement.
Before concluding, we discuss whether civic integration policies actually work.
Evaluating whether civic integration policies actually work is difficult.
To our knowledge, the two last goals of civic integration policies have received little empirical attention.
Moreover, these civic integration policies arguably bring nationhood into the story in the wrong way.
Following the financial crisis, discourse on family reunification increasingly linked civic integration to economic growth agendas.
A questioning of the causal relation assumed between citizenship as a uniform legal status and civic integration followed.
The debate between supporters and critics of differentiated citizenship centres on the model's supposed effect on civic integration.
This broadly positive assessment of the effects of differentiated citizenship on civic integration is increasingly being questioned.
As such, it not incompatible with liberal measures of civic integration, although it severely condemns illiberal projects of civic integration as assimilationist projects in disguise (Kymlicka, 2012, pp. 15 16).
