citing divisions over

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "citing divisions over" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the act of mentioning or referencing disagreements or differences of opinion on a particular issue. Example: "The report is citing divisions over the proposed policy changes among the committee members."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Mutual suspicion is now deeply entrenched.For several years, many within and beyond the European Union have bemoaned its inability to co-ordinate and present a common foreign policy, citing divisions over Russia as the clearest example.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

He also cited divisions over a suicide bombing at a wedding in Kandahar Province last year that was organized by a more radical field commander, without the approval of the Taliban leadership.

The New York Times

I have cited his work over and over, in my writing and in my talks.

University of California, Berkeley

After its release, Homme sacked Oliveri, citing over-indulgence.

The Guardian - Music

Republican lawmakers have cited deep divisions in the party over the issue, including granting legal status to 11 million undocumented immigrants.

Huffington Post

But it shelved the expansion, citing concerns over money.

The New York Times - Arts

Earlier this year, ratings agency Moody's cited concerns over the two divisions as a key reason behind its move to cut Sony's credit rating to junk status.

BBC

Last month, ratings agency Moody's cited concerns over the two divisions as a key reason behind its move to cut the Japanese firm's credit rating to junk status.

BBC

"Organizations are citing substantial benefits over traditional on-premises implementations.

Forbes

They reversed a decision to sell GM's European Opel division, citing its crucial engineering value.

Forbes

We know about the divisions over immigration.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "citing divisions over", ensure that the context clearly identifies the specific issues or topics where disagreements exist. This adds clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "citing divisions over" without specifying the nature or scope of the divisions. Being too vague can weaken your argument or analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "citing divisions over" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a participle phrase when used to modify a noun or clause. As supported by Ludwig AI, it indicates the act of referencing disagreements or differences as a reason or explanation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

25%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "citing divisions over" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate the act of referencing disagreements or differences of opinion as a reason or explanation. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It is particularly prevalent in news and media, academic, and scientific contexts, maintaining a neutral register suitable for analytical and explanatory purposes. While alternatives like "mentioning disagreements regarding" or "referencing disputes about" exist, "citing divisions over" effectively conveys the act of using disagreements as a rationale. When using this phrase, ensure you specify the nature of the divisions to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

mentioning disagreements regarding

Replaces "citing" with "mentioning" and "divisions over" with "disagreements regarding", providing a more descriptive alternative.

referencing disputes about

Substitutes "citing" with "referencing" and "divisions over" with "disputes about", emphasizing the contentious nature of the disagreements.

pointing out differences concerning

Replaces "citing divisions" with "pointing out differences", offering a less formal and more direct alternative.

noting conflicts surrounding

Changes "citing divisions" to "noting conflicts", highlighting the presence of active opposition.

acknowledging disagreements on

Replaces "citing divisions" with "acknowledging disagreements", indicating a recognition of the differing opinions.

highlighting schisms regarding

Substitutes "citing divisions" with "highlighting schisms", emphasizing deep and significant rifts.

identifying rifts concerning

Changes "citing divisions" to "identifying rifts", pointing out the existence of significant breaks or separations.

referring to discord over

Replaces "citing divisions" with "referring to discord", focusing on the lack of harmony or agreement.

indicating splits about

Substitutes "citing divisions" with "indicating splits", suggesting clear separations or factions.

alluding to fragmentation regarding

Changes "citing divisions" to "alluding to fragmentation", offering a more subtle and indirect reference to the disagreements.

FAQs

How can I use "citing divisions over" in a sentence?

You can use "citing divisions over" to indicate that disagreements or differences of opinion are being referenced as a reason or explanation for something. For example, "The committee delayed the decision, citing divisions over funding priorities."

What is a more formal alternative to "citing divisions over"?

A more formal alternative could be "referencing disputes about", which maintains a professional tone while conveying a similar meaning.

How does "citing divisions over" differ from "noting disagreements regarding"?

"Citing divisions over" implies that the divisions are a primary reason or justification, whereas "noting disagreements regarding" simply acknowledges the existence of disagreements without necessarily attributing a causal role.

Is "citing divisions over" appropriate for academic writing?

Yes, "citing divisions over" is appropriate for academic writing when you need to reference disagreements or conflicting viewpoints as contributing factors to a particular outcome or situation.