Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(8)
And all information that is cited, should be accessible to the scientific community.
First, all sources cited should be readily available to reviewers, which would have made it easier to see that the source for the 2035 date was a news report.
However, despite their determination by Liao (1989, 1991, 1996), all the voucher specimens cited should be identified as B. monoica sensu Ohba and Akiyama (2014).
For instance, Collins seems to believe that randomized trial data like the data that his group has exclusive access to, as opposed to observational studies like the one Dr. Abramson cited, should be used to estimate side-effect rates.
In the section 'Previous publication' the reference number cited should be 26 (not 22).
Reference 10, as the only human study cited, should be explored more than the rat and monkey studies.
Similar(52)
After all, if the government won't get an indictment for al-Awlaki — who, given all the evidence Sullivan cites, should be very indictable — why would it get one for someone who is more marginal, and against whom it has a more ambiguous case that is harder to prove?
The studies you cite should be strongly related to your research question.
Although a feature story is subjective, all facts it cites should be objectively true (unless it's clear the writer is playing with the boundaries between fact and fiction, the way Hunter S. Thompson did, for example).
Any sources you cite should be thoroughly checked for reliability.
Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira's affiliation should be "Setor de Fisiologia Humana e do Exercício" and his name should be cited as "de Lira CA".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com