cited for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cited for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to someone who has been called out or held responsible for something. For example, "The CEO was cited for violating safety regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was twice cited for contempt.

The New York Times

They can be cited for disorderly conduct.

The New York Times

The top reasons cited for buying kosher?

The New York Times - Food

308, is cited for the same purpose.

Harvard University

No sources were cited for the findings.

The New York Times - Food

Armstrong was then cited for the accidents.

The Guardian - Sport

The driver was cited for speeding.

The New York Times

They were cited for misdemeanor criminal damage.

The New York Times

There are various causes cited for this.

The Guardian - Travel

Gianforte was later cited for misdemeanor assault.

The Washington Post

Specific examples are cited for plane and cylindrical cavities.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cited for", ensure that the reason for the citation is clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For instance, "The study was cited for its innovative methodology."

Common error

Avoid using "cited for" when you simply mean "mentioned" or "referenced". "Cited for" implies a formal acknowledgement, often in legal or academic contexts, or when someone is being held accountable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cited for" functions as a passive construction indicating the reason or basis for a formal reference, accusation, or acknowledgement. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cited for" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to indicate the reason behind a formal reference, accusation, or acknowledgement. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and prevalence across diverse contexts, particularly in news, academic, and scientific domains. Related phrases offer similar meanings, but may vary slightly in emphasis or formality. To use the phrase effectively, ensure that the reason for the citation is explicitly stated and appropriate for the given context. Keep in mind that there's a difference between "cited for" (a formal acknowledgement) and simply "mentioned" or "referenced". This makes "cited for" a valuable asset in formal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

called to account for

Indicates being held responsible or having to explain actions.

indicted for

Specifically refers to a formal accusation of a crime.

referenced in relation to

Emphasizes the act of referencing something in connection with another subject.

mentioned due to

Focuses on the act of mentioning rather than formal citation or accountability.

penalized as a result of

Focuses on the penalization aspect due to an action.

recognized because of

Highlights acknowledgement or recognition based on a particular reason.

acknowledged because of

Highlights the act of acknowledging something as a reason or cause.

lauded for

Implies strong praise or admiration.

commended on account of

Highlights the commendation or praise received due to something.

admonished regarding

Implies a formal reprimand or warning concerning a specific matter.

FAQs

How to use "cited for" in a sentence?

Use "cited for" to indicate that someone or something is being formally referenced or acknowledged, often in legal, academic, or critical contexts. For example, "The company was "cited for safety violations"."

What can I say instead of "cited for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "mentioned due to", "acknowledged because of", or "referenced in relation to".

Which is correct, "cited for" or "cited with"?

"Cited for" is generally correct when indicating the reason for the citation. "Cited with" is less common and typically used when listing multiple items or reasons simultaneously. For example, "He was "cited for speeding"." is correct, but "cited with" might be appropriate in a legal context like "cited with multiple offenses".

What's the difference between "cited for" and "charged with"?

"Cited for" is a more general term for referencing or acknowledging something, or being issued a minor infraction notice. "Charged with" refers specifically to being formally accused of a crime in a legal setting. For instance, a driver might be "cited for a traffic violation" but "charged with drunk driving".