The phrase "cited a paper" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used in academic or research writing to refer to quoting or mentioning a specific paper or article as a source of information or evidence. Example: The author cited a paper by Smith and Jones (2019) to support her argument about the benefits of mindfulness meditation on reducing stress levels.
He cited a paper published earlier this year that looked at how gender stereotypes affected black and white voters' behavior in the 2016 presidential election.
He cited a paper by David Gunnell, a professor of epidemiology, Keith Hawton, a professor of psychiatry and Nav Kapur, a professor of psychiatry and population health, which found an increase in the number of narrative verdicts.
The Times recently cited a paper by David Romer (PDF), a professor of political economy at the University of California at Berkeley, that has become "the gospel for the antipunting faction".
Recently, I spotted a short creationist essay that had cited a paper of mine on various recent pterosaur finds and which was supposed to be some kind of response to an article written for the Observer.
Sessions cited a paper that claimed to prove this statistically and dubbed it the "ACLU Effect". But as we documented here at The Watch, critics have poked holes in that paper and pointed to other possible causes for the rise in murders, including fluctuating funding for anti-violence intervention groups, that seem to be much more closely tied to the city's murder rate.
We have more than 25 other tree species in British Columbia, so while the situation is very serious, it is not as catastrophic as you suggest.Scott Green Associate professor University of Northern British Columbia Prince George, CanadaSIR – You cited a paper co-authored by Richard Newell, the "head of America's Energy Information Administration".
No need to figure out where a past conference took place when citing a paper.
In a new post, Mr Krugman cites a paper by John Irons and Josh Bivens which looks to refute the Reinhart-Rogoff conclusion.
It cites a paper from the Max Planck Institute, released earlier this year, which looks at the "cohort fertility" rates of adult women.
Treasury cites a paper that estimates that the benefits of corporate tax cuts take 20 years to flow through.
Ever since it came out, Obama-bashers have loved to cite a paper by Baker, Bloom, and Davis claiming that policy uncertainty is holding back the recovery.
