Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The Hammarlund (2008) paper is in complete disagreement with this manuscript, nevertheless the authors should cite this manuscript for first demonstrating that open syntaxin bypasses the requirement for CAPs (paragraph two of the subsection "A post-docking role for CAPS-1 in DCVs Fusion" in the Discussion).
Similar(59)
These reviews have been cited in this manuscript.
Many of the relevant papers from this corpus of work are cited in this manuscript.
See for example review by Domenici et al. (2011) cited in this manuscript.
Unpublished observations cited in this manuscript were supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI52203, and R37AI44257).
There are at least 2 studies on Polistes, both of which are already cited in this manuscript.
H.Z. and P.C.F. have worked with GSK on some of the studies cited in this manuscript, and are involved in ongoing collaborations with GSK.
Relevant questions were culled from a number of the literature cited in this manuscript [1, 6, 16, 20 – 25, 25 – 27] and incorporated into the study's draft questionnaire/guide.
The observation is not entirely novel because integrated pararetrovirus sequences have been reported previously in other plant genomes (petunia and rice) as duly cited in this manuscript.
All of the reasons for the EHR4CR PF system mismatches need to be independently treated and the recommendations and guidelines for data quality previously cited in this manuscript considered as a solution for them.
We have now cited this work in our manuscript.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com