Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"cite about" is not correct or usable in written English.
You could use "cite for," which is used when citing somebody or something in order to support an argument or opinion. For example, "I cited a study done by the University of Edinburgh to support my argument."
Exact(7)
Some estimates cite about 3,000 military personnel killed in combat, the great bulk of them being Boxers and other Chinese fighters.
They cite about $2 million planned for the renovation of a hospital at Igbogene (except that there was no hospital there in need of renovation, they said), $2.6 million approved for an AIDS facility that state Health Ministry officials were unaware of, and $3.3 million for hospital construction in Bayelsa that the Health Ministry also knew nothing about.
News reports cite about 250,000 layoffs globally, and the EIA said international and US oil producers wrote down $38bn in assets in the third quarter of 2015, the largest for any quarter since at least 2008 for the 46 companies they track.
Annual reports from the Oakland Police Department cite about 20 Stingray arrests a year.
Some doctors may cite the theoretical risk as their justification or claim that they fear such information will discourage condom use and drive up STD transmission rates, fears some doctors also cite about promoting PrEP.
They cite about 1400 other articles and have so far been cited by about 300 articles.
Similar(52)
American precedents were cited about half as often as Canadian ones.
Put another way, on a per-bed basis, Select hospitals were cited about four times as often as the average.
During our interview, Agus cites about a dozen recent, varied studies, all pooling into a knowledge reservoir.
The evidence he cites about the inefficiency of these checkpoints is interesting and persuasive, but it's evidence against checkpoints, not drunk-driving laws.
But in spite of publishing in more prestigious titles, women's papers were cited about 3% less frequently.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com