Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The literature yielded 1213 citations, of which 97 full-text articles were reviewed.
The literature search identified 375 citations of which 50 contained relevant original data.
The initial search yielded 270 citations, of which 52 were excluded for duplication.
The search yielded 272 citations of which 24 underwent full text review after screening of the titles and abstracts.
RESULTS: Our search yielded 475 citations of which eleven were reviewed in full after applying exclusion criteria.
Results Our initial search yielded 1528 citations, of which 744 were excluded as irrelevant for the scope of this review or being duplicate.
We retrieved 4152 unique citations, of which we considered 546 to be potentially eligible.
Initial database searches retrieved 722 citations of which 525 citations remained after duplicates were removed.
This returned only 139 citations, of which just six full-text empirical papers were obtained.
Our search retrieved 135 citations of which 74 abstracts were screened after removal of duplicates.
The database search identified 163 citations, of which 51 full text articles were retrieved for evaluation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com