Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We could not find a correlation between PRS and WIT (P = 0.566), CIT (P = 0.439) or transaminase levels on POD 1 to 3. The correlation between WIT >60 minutes and IPGF was confirmed using the Pearson chi-square test (P < 0.0001).
Similar(59)
There was no significant correlation between the dose of norepinephrine and the precision of CItd (P = 0.06), GEDVi (P = 0.10) and EVLWi (P = 0.91).
However, it did not achieve statistical significance for the transplants performed with more than 4 hours of CIT difference (p = 0.55).
Despite this, pair-wise comparisons showed that the renal cortical GSH was depleted by ~68% in WT + STZ mice vs WT + Cit mice (p < 0.05, Student's t test), manifesting as a significant depletion in GSH consistent with hyperglycaemia-induced oxidative stress.
Wattarujeekrit et al. (2004) [27] apply a lexical sampling method (Palmer et al., op cit, [2] p. 85) to construct predicate-argument representations for a small number of biologically relevant verbs.
However, the Kojiki " … just inscribed what was passed from the ancient age, and so its words, ideas, and things are in accord with one another, and everything reveals the truth of that age" (Cited in Burns, p. 71).
The coefficient of correlation between the fluid-induced percentage changes in CIpc and in CItd was 0.72 (P < 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 1).
The coefficient of correlation between the norepinephrine-induced percentage changes in CIpw and in CItd was -0.003 (P = 0.65) (Table 3, Figure 3).
The coefficient of correlation between the norepinephrine-induced percentage changes in CIpc and in CItd was 0.78 (P < 0.05) (Table 3, Figure 3).
The coefficient of correlation between the percentage changes induced by the therapeutic interventions in CIpc and in CItd was 0.73 (P < 0.05).
The coefficient of correlation between the percentage changes induced by the therapeutic interventions in CIpw and in CItd was 0.006 (P = 0.11).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com