Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
The comparisons probe issues of building type, spatial organization and circulation, material and structure, detailing and ornamentation, as well as philosophical, sociological, and cultural contexts.
In this paper, we have experimentally studied the impact of particle size distribution (PSD) on the fracture sealing capability of lost circulation material (LCM) blends.
Combating loss by the proper use of wellbore strengthening materials (WSM) and lost circulation material (LCM) is fundamental to a successful drilling.
The stable FPPs were measured using synthetic based mud (SBM) with and without lost circulation material (LCM), and compared with the large-scale fracturing experiments conducted at the Drilling Engineering Association DEAA) 13 investigation.
The method was developed based on a comprehensive laboratory investigation that was conducted to determine the relationship between effectiveness of different lost circulation material (LCM) treatments in terms of the sealing efficiency and PSD.
The lost circulation material used in these experiments is made out of ionic shape memory polymers.
Similar(50)
The results suggest the particle lost circulation materials (LCM) can improve the bridging capacity of fiber cement slurry.
Laboratory studies have been used extensively to evaluate loss circulation materials (LCM) treatments to solve or prevent lost circulation problems in fractured formations.
Low pressure-bearing capacity of a plugging zone will result in excessive consumption of lost circulation materials (LCMs) and extra down time.
Different laboratory experimental setups with slotted disks, simulating fractures' apertures, have been used extensively to formulate effective loss circulation materials (LCM) recipes.
Gel slurries are composed of distilled water, Sodium-Silicate solution, polymer solution, lost circulation materials, weighting agent and organic initiator (initiating the gelation).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com