Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
It's a circular explanation.
But often what remains is a circular explanation, description masquerading as a causal account.
If they are explained in terms of something else, they still remain unaccounted for, since the explanation would invoke either an infinite regress of causes or a circular explanation.
Similar(57)
We have, then, 2 components to the theory of natural selection under Lipton and Thompson's approach: 1) a general statement about the nature of filter theories as recursive but not circular explanations of evolutionary change; 2) the detailed development of such filter theories.
9. Note how the criticism previously offered of Velleman fits into this criticism as a special case: to distinguish love from respect, Velleman appeals to the effects love but not respect has, yet he can offer no non-circular explanation as to why love has these effects.
Whether or not a theory of attention can be turned into a non-circular explanation of reference, the idea that attention and reference are related does seem to be an idea that can cast some light on what goes on when we understand referring expressions.
So, the third reason for behaviorism's appeal is that it tries to avoid circular, regressive explanations of behavior.
Unfortunately, it is far from clear what that evidence would be unless it includes the truth of some of the very core beliefs whose nature we are trying to explain, apparently rendering the explanation circular.
"Your explanation is circular".
More importantly, this explanation is circular because a bias in the opposite direction could equally well have been explained by arguing that the prior distribution is biased in favor of large magnitudes.
The radius of each circle represents 10% of the tested population and the mean heading vector arrow would be as long as the radius if every worm converged on one heading, and have zero length if worms distributed randomly around the plate (see Figure 1 figure supplement 1B for explanation of circular plots).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com