The phrase "circle of privacy" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is often used to describe a situation in which one's personal matters and/or sensitive information are kept private and secure. For example, "I'm grateful for the circle of privacy my family provides to keep my personal matters private."
In the case of Pakistan, at least, the archives that could give shape to a subaltern narrative are lost, scattered or obscured behind concentric circles of privacy, without a will to even look.
With Vero, there are only four levels of sharing, and they form what Hariri called "concentric circles" of privacy.
And by the way, if you are interested to know why, in Africa, almost all girls drop out of education at puberty, one reason is the lack of sanitary provision – the mere absence of a circle of sticks for privacy.
Dave Eggers's The Circle, about the abolition of privacy in the age of social media, is a must-read dystopian novel – the future it envisages has all but arrived.
(Do you share information with a wide circle of friends or value your privacy?) The researchers found, to their surprise, that frequency of Facebook use, whether it was for personal status updates or to connect with friends, was not associated with narcissism.
'The Circle' Is a Thriller About the Total Loss of Privacy.
As for the potential downside of this loss of privacy, it is waved away by Circle executives as if too trifling to even consider.
While Dave Eggers's new novel, "The Circle," blames a Google doppelgänger for the eventual complete loss of privacy, in reality, much of the fault will be our own.
This brings up all kinds of privacy concerns, which reduce the flow of content creation and sharing to limited circles (Yes, I said "circles". Don't even try it, Google).
It is a matter of educating them about the difference between between privacy, publicity and a circle of trust.
