The reported results refer to the signal recorded at electrode POz except for one subject, where due to excessive noise in one condition we chose to analyze Pz instead.
We chose to analyze the VDJ region instead of the Sμ region as the use of V-specific primers precludes PCR amplification of contaminating DNA and hence, likely yields more reliable results.
Unfortunately, the authors do not concentrate on this enlarged potential window, but instead chose to analyze only the insertion part of the reaction in the 4.5 2 V versus Li+/Li potential window.
We chose to analyze the TTP of the first pregnancy instead of the TTP of all pregnancies.
We chose to analyze these promoter regions.
We choose to analyze proteins instead of nucleotide sequences to facilitate generation of alignments and because WSP amino acid diversity largely reflects the nucleotide diversity.
Instead, we have chosen to analyze the full dataset, relying on statistical analysis, model selection, and model averaging to disentangle the web of correlations among radiological disease, OA risk factors, and biomarkers.
Why did she choose to analyze this level?
We chose to do so, instead of analyzing a larger set of multiple hundred or thousand (compound) features, because the selected features have repeatedly been found useful in the analysis of medical images [15, 28, 30, 40] and robust against variations between scanners and protocol parameters [41], especially after normalization [20].
Declining to ask for quarter, Mercer chose to resist instead.
Therefore, we chose instead to analyze our miR-130a transgenics as F0 lines between embryonic days 13.5 to 14.5 of development.
