We chose data for the year 2010 because the household data were also collected during 2010.
Despite these issues, planners rarely consider the effects of errors when choosing data for spatially explicit conservation prioritizations.
The chosen data rate for the subcarrier is compared to the data rate in the current Bit-Map.
Combining predicted parameters with one optimally chosen data point for vapor pressure yields already an accuracy of 4% average RMSD in vapor pressure.
In Table 1, results for the chosen data evaluation algorithms are presented.
To choose presence data for each replicate, bootstrapping allowing sampling with replacement was used.
The training procedure starts with randomly chosen nonface data for the initial stage.
To illustrate the procedure, a small part of the landslide prone area was chosen as data for validation.
The reason for choosing this data for the evaluation is the following: 1) it was used by ChIPDiff [ 11] and is easily compared to our program; and 2) differential histone modification sites have been validated in the same study [ 18].
The assumptions we make about this complexity greatly influences the analytical methods we choose for data mining and, in turn, our results and inferences.
