Sentence examples for choice of principles from inspiring English sources

This is ultimately what the parties are trying to accomplish in their choice of principles of justice.

In fact the veil of ignorance deprives the parties of all facts about citizens that are irrelevant to the choice of principles of justice: not only their race, class, and gender but also their age, natural endowments, and more.

The strategy of the original position is to construct a method of reasoning that models abstract ideas about justice so as to focus their power together onto the choice of principles.

They show that either of the classical conditional forms of capture or release are inconsistent by themselves, over the base theory supplemented by the right choice of principles providing for completeness or consistency of truth.

In so far as the OP is an appropriately defined objective point of view incorporating all relevant moral reasons and conditions on rational choice of principles of justice, and the parties therein come to a unanimous agreement, then the principles agreed to are also objective (TJ 516 517/453).

seeks to model the structure of practical reasoning in the categorical imperative procedure, so Rawls seeks to model the priority of right over the good in the original position by the reasonable constraints imposed on rational individuals' choice of principles that promote their good.

Thus, the choice of principle can be based on whether a positive or negative regulation of reporter gene activity is desirable.

Keeping in mind the choice-of-law principles and methodology set forth in these prior cases, we turn to the choice-of-law issue presented by the facts of this case.

The brief of amicus curie Pacific Legal Foundation suggests that because, as compared to other states' consumer protection laws, the UCL "provides the broadest right of action to the widest number of people," the reach of the statute should be restrained in the application of California's choice-of-law principles.

Not surprisingly, following the maximin rule of choice results in choice of the principles of justice over the principles of utility (average or aggregate); for unlike utilitarianism, justice as fairness guarantees equal basic liberties, fair equal opportunities, and an adequate social minimum for all citizens.

Google contends that Plaintiffs lack standing to allege such violations and that the California law should not apply due to choice of law principles.