Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(41)
Our resuscitation protocol left the choice of fluid solution to the prescribing physician.
Clinically, substantial controversy still surrounds the choice of fluid for resuscitation.
The right choice of fluid replacement still is a matter of debate.
Importantly, many new large multicenter clinical trials have provided insight as to the potential deleterious effects of specific types of solutions [29]-[33] [29]-[33]he choice of fluid less an academakingercise and more a therapeutichoice
A comparison with magnetic separation in the narrow channel design is done and recommendation for optimal choice of fluid flow rate and magnitude of external magnetic field is discussed.
Finally, the importance of optimal pre-hospital care and decision-making, such as preferential transport to trauma centers while minimizing transport times, has been well established, (Minardi and Crocco 2009) while choice of fluid resuscitation is an ongoing area of uncertainty and research (Chowdhury et al. 2014).
Similar(19)
At this point, the other factors such as cost, gel damage, and fluid loss were used to narrow down the choice of fluids.
Therefore the choice of fluids varies widely.
Conclusions The current evidence on choice of fluids for resuscitation in children with infections is weak.
For years, there has been debate regarding the optimal choice of fluids in the traumatic brain injured population.
Following this finding, uncertainty about the best choice of fluids persisted due to a lack of adequately powered randomized, controlled trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com