Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The proposed hierarchical models, upon an appropriate choice of approximation order, yield accurate results with a reduced computational cost.
The optimum choice of approximation order is investigated through sensitivity numerical studies of the S4, S6 and S8 approximations, which approximations correspond to 24, 48 and 80 fluxes, respectively.
Similar(58)
It is shown that the total error can be bounded by the best approximation error which in turn depends on the concrete choice of the approximation space (V_{h}).
The choice of sufficient approximation order is suggested.
The precise choice of derivative approximation turns out to be crucial.
Our detailed analysis will aid future researchers in the appropriate choice of PDE approximation for analysing models of animal movement.
It is shown that upon an appropriate choice of the approximation order, the proposed models are able to match the three-dimensional reference solutions.
Yet, such a slight modification leads to several attractive properties of HFF-AAC, including the convenient choice of an approximation domain, the decrease of the number of RBF-NN inputs, and semiglobal practical asymptotic stability dominated by control gains.
This justifies our choice of the approximation to V ( d ) : V 0 ( d ) = 1 4 π d ( 8 - d ) 8 ln 16 d ( 8 - d ) + ln ( 1 + ln 16 d ( 8 - d ) ) + 2 π The constant 2 π instead of γ (and the numerator 16 ) are chosen so that for d = 4 we have V ( 4 ) = V 0 ( 4 ) = 1.
Thus, the Lagrange's multiplier [17, 19] can be identified as begin{aligned} lambda (x) = (-1)^{n} s-x ^{n-1}/ n-1)!. end{aligned} s-x ^{n-1}/ n-1on is considered as the fixed point of the following functional [11] under the suitable choice of initial approximation [21] (u_{0} s-x ^{n-1}/ n-1
In general, the choice of the SI approximation method should be evaluated in an application context to establish whether increased compression performance outweighs the added encoding complexity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com