Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
children were crying
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "children were crying" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where children are expressing their emotions through tears, often in contexts related to distress or sadness. Example: "As the thunderstorm raged outside, the children were crying, frightened by the loud noises."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
37 human-written examples
My children were crying.
News & Media
"The children were crying".
News & Media
My children were crying constantly".
News & Media
"Children were crying for food.
News & Media
Lots of children were crying.
News & Media
The children were crying for water.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
22 human-written examples
"My women and children are crying.
News & Media
"A lot of the children are crying at the camp.
News & Media
The children are crying, or the parents are crying?
News & Media
"Look here, mothers are crying, children are crying, because there is no news about victims," he said.
News & Media
"What is the benefit when children are crying and people are dying due to hunger?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "children were crying", ensure the context clearly indicates the cause of their distress to enhance the reader's understanding and emotional connection.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase "children were crying" excessively in passive constructions, as it can weaken the impact of the sentence. Instead, focus on active descriptions of the children's emotional state and the specific reasons for their tears.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "children were crying" functions as a descriptive statement, illustrating an emotional state. Ludwig AI shows examples where it describes reactions to traumatic events, general distress, or expressions of sadness. It uses the past continuous tense to emphasize the ongoing nature of the action.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Formal & Business
10%
Science
12%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "children were crying" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe children expressing sadness or distress. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in various contexts, most notably in news and media, indicating real-world events and situations. The phrase serves to evoke empathy and highlight vulnerability. While straightforward, careful consideration should be given to the surrounding context to ensure the message's full impact and emotional depth. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the cause of the children's distress. Alternative phrases like "kids were sobbing" or "youngsters were weeping" can offer different nuances.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the kids were in tears
Rephrases the sentence structure to focus on the presence of tears.
kids were sobbing
Replaces "crying" with "sobbing", suggesting a more intense form of crying.
the youths were tearful
Focuses on the presence of tears as a sign of sadness or distress.
youngsters were weeping
Substitutes "children" with "youngsters" and "crying" with "weeping", offering a slightly more formal tone.
babies were wailing
Changes "children" to "babies" and "crying" to "wailing", indicating a higher-pitched and more distressed cry.
infants were bawling
Replaces "children" with "infants" and "crying" with "bawling", implying loud and unrestrained crying.
toddlers were upset
Uses "upset" instead of "crying", suggesting a broader emotional distress that may or may not involve tears.
the little ones were distressed
Employs "distressed" instead of "crying", highlighting their emotional suffering.
the minors were in anguish
Uses "anguish" to emphasize deep emotional pain, making it more dramatic.
the juveniles were lamenting
Substitutes "children" with "juveniles" and "crying" with "lamenting", adding a formal and sorrowful tone.
FAQs
How can I describe why "children were crying" in more detail?
To provide more detail, specify the cause of their tears: "The children were crying because they were scared", or describe the manner of crying: "The children were crying loudly and uncontrollably".
What are some alternatives to the phrase "children were crying"?
You can use alternatives like "kids were sobbing", "youngsters were weeping", or "babies were wailing" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it more effective to say "the children cried" or "children were crying"?
"The children cried" is a simple past tense, indicating a completed action. "Children were crying" uses the past continuous tense, suggesting an ongoing state. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the action or the state of crying.
What is the difference between saying "a child was crying" versus "children were crying"?
"A child was crying" refers to a single child, while "children were crying" refers to multiple children. The choice depends on whether you're describing one child or a group of children.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested