Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
We hypothesised that a perceptual function would best predict reaction time in adults (Hypothesis 1) and in children (Hypothesis 3).
Thus, we hypothesised that a perceptual, rather than a numerical, function would best predict reaction time in children (Hypothesis 3).
Based on Defever et al.'s (2012) findings, we specifically hypothesised that PSC would be the best predictor of reaction time in children (Hypothesis 4).
Specifically, we expected PC to be the best predictor of reaction time in adults (Hypothesis 2), and PSC to be the best predictor of reaction time in children (Hypothesis 4).
Similar(56)
First, we ran linear regressions to examine which function would best predict reaction time in adults (Hypotheses 1 & 2) and in children (Hypotheses 3 & 4).
Whereas face and content validity was assessed by a ground up or de novo approach based on qualitative focus group interviews with the targeted children, hypotheses regarding the construct validity were confirmed in that the inventory varied systematically and in the expected direction with self-reported oral health indicators.
The prior probability of each child hypothesis is set to a fraction of its parent posterior probability that is proportional to its relative activation with respect to other child hypotheses.
At the level of motor commands, the hypotheses can be split into several child hypotheses at each node.
These preliminary data suggest an additional health risk that may be related to aflatoxin exposure in children, a hypothesis that merits further testing.
We expect that the longer an adult child shares care with other informal care-givers, the lower the burden that an adult child experiences (Hypothesis 4); and the more types of care-giving tasks an adult child shares with others, the lower the care-giver burden (Hypothesis 5).
The youngest child's hypothesis about writing is that words must be similar in some way to the objects they represent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com