Sentence examples for child responsiveness from inspiring English sources

The measure consists of six global emotional availability dimensions – adult sensitivity, adult structuring, adult non-intrusiveness, adult non-hostility, child responsiveness and child initiation.

The interrater reliabilities (intraclass correlation coefficients) were as follows:.65 for child responsiveness,.52 for parent responsiveness,.83 for dyadic reciprocity, and.75 for dyadic cooperation.

Three variables were eligible for two of the three models- maternal positive affect during puzzle task (PI, PS), child responsiveness during the free play (PS, PH) and child independence during the free play (PI, PS).

Two IVs, GHQ somatic symptoms and child responsiveness during the puzzle task, were excluded from the model due to correlations with GHQ psychiatric caseness and child's exact age, respectively.

The method has been validated [ 75- 79] and consists of six dimensions assessing the bidirectional emotional availability between the child and the adult: 1) adult sensitivity, 2) adult structuring, 3) adult non-intrusiveness, 4) adult non-hostility, 5) child responsiveness, and 6) child involvement of the adult.

The secondary aim will be to examine the effect of the FDI in comparison to the WLC on maternal self-reported feeding practices and child satiety responsiveness.

The latter can include denying a child emotional responsiveness, or being detached and uninvolved.

The measure assesses the quality of the mother-infant relationship across four caregiver scales (sensitivity, structuring, nonintrusiveness and nonhostility) and two child scales (responsiveness and involvement).

Biringen uses the concept of sensitivity to denote a variety of parental qualities that keep adults warm and emotionally connected to their children, including responsiveness, an accurate perception of the children's communication and an ability to smoothly resolve conflicts.

Checklists and logbooks assess the preschool personnel's reports of intervention completeness, fidelity measures, possible barriers to implementation, and children's responsiveness to the components in intervention.

Additionally, research personnel used and investigator developed checklists (classroom rating scales), teachers' self-reports of intervention completeness, fidelity measures, barriers to implementation and children's responsiveness to the SHAPES intervention.