Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(9)
The couple's entering into the slave child contract and then proceeding to have a child under that contract thus violates the child's right.
Let p be the child who in fact exists and suffers as a result of the couple's entering into the slave child contract.
And let q be any one of the children who might have existed had the couple not entered into the slave child contract yet still produced a child.
It then notes further that – again calculating probability just prior to choice – the probability of the particular child's coming into existence is also very low, even given that the agents do enter into the slave child contract.
Suppose, that is, that it is Harry who is in fact brought into existence as a slave, the couple having entered the slave child contract and conceived and produced a child.
The nonidentity analysis has it that the couple's entering into the slave child contract does not make things worse for the child since (very probably) that particular child would never have existed at all in the absence of that act.
Similar(50)
The child contracts pneumonia and is ordered to a hospital.
For instance, what if their unvaccinated child contracted a disease and then passed it on to a vulnerable newborn too young to have been vaccinated yet?
Gul and one other child contracted the disease in early May.
(4) Perceived relative vulnerability: Perceived risk of their own child contracting the disease and perceived risk of other children contracting the disease were measured using a VAS.
No matter what age a child contracted the disease it progressed at the same rapid rate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com