Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Data was entered into Epidata version 3.2 (Epidata association, Denmark) and exported to STATA 12 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA) where after checking for duplicate entries a preliminary analysis of each variable was made to identify additional range and omission errors.
The survey data was entered into Epidata version 3.2 (Epidata association, Denmark) and exported to SPSS version 17 where after checking for duplicate entries a preliminary analysis of each variable was made to identify additional range and omission errors.
Similar(58)
The dataset was checked for duplicate entries.
Additionally, admin will check for duplicate entries in the CRDB.
For example, the system is not yet checking for duplicate uploads.
A trained data manager checked the database for duplicate entries by comparing victim demographics and incident times and locations.
After checking for duplicates, we analyzed unique or new cases for incidence.
Patients were randomly selected from these local databases, after checking for duplicates between centers.
Bug fixed for duplicate entries for some reads, sensitivity improved.
This eliminates the need for duplicate entries.
In our search for duplicate entries, we therefore look for entries with the same InChI identifier.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com