Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
checking for accessibility
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "checking for accessibility" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of evaluating whether something is accessible to all users, particularly in the context of websites, documents, or physical spaces. Example: "Before launching the new website, we are checking for accessibility to ensure that all users can navigate it easily."
✓ Grammatically correct
Website compliance
Physical space evaluation
Software testing
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Their enforcement of such hypothetical rules needn't be so iron-fisted, but just knowing that they are checking for accessibility compliance would, in theory, be a great show of goodwill to those in the accessibility community.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
If you are using Siteimprove to check for accessibility concerns on your website, remember that you still need to do additional manual testing, even after Siteimprove's scan.
Academia
Tighten any remaining screws and check for accessibility.
Wiki
Some individuals are unable to log in to Siteimprove, Cornell's tool for checking website accessibility.
Academia
On Hotels.com, for example, users must first conduct a general search and then filter those results by checking off accessibility preferences like "roll-in shower" and "handicapped parking".
News & Media
To exclude the latter hypothesis and to check the accessibility for recombination of the PfI2 locus, we introduced a targeted modification in the locus without loss-of-function.
Science
Anyone wanting to check for wheelchair spaces should call the same number and speak to the London 2012 Accessibility team.
News & Media
Check, check, check for Ms. Sandberg.
News & Media
and checked for errors.
Science
Check for job completion.
Science
Take care of the below points when checking the house: Accessibility from main road is good.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When "checking for accessibility", use specific accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG) to guide your evaluation and ensure comprehensive coverage.
Common error
Avoid solely depending on automated tools when "checking for accessibility". Manual testing with assistive technologies is essential to identify issues that automated tools might miss.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "checking for accessibility" functions as a gerund phrase acting as a noun, often used as a preliminary step before improvements. According to Ludwig, this phrase is valid and commonly used.
Frequent in
Academia
33%
News & Media
33%
Science
16%
Less common in
Wiki
12%
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "checking for accessibility" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to describe the process of evaluating whether something is usable by people with disabilities. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. While frequently found in academic and news contexts, it's important to use specific standards during evaluation and to supplement automated tools with manual testing for a comprehensive assessment.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
assessing accessibility
Focuses on a formal evaluation of accessibility, emphasizing a thorough process.
evaluating accessibility
Highlights the process of judging the level of accessibility based on specific criteria.
verifying accessibility
Stresses confirming that accessibility standards are met, ensuring compliance.
testing for accessibility
Emphasizes the practical examination to identify accessibility issues.
ensuring accessibility
Focuses on guaranteeing that something is accessible, making it a priority.
confirming accessibility
Highlights the act of validating that accessibility requirements are fulfilled.
reviewing accessibility
Focuses on a detailed inspection of accessibility features and compliance.
inspecting for accessibility
Emphasizes a careful and thorough examination of accessibility aspects.
auditing accessibility
Indicates a systematic and independent evaluation of accessibility practices.
accessibility compliance review
Uses a more formal tone to emphasize review process.
FAQs
What does "checking for accessibility" mean?
Checking for accessibility refers to the process of evaluating a product, service, or environment to ensure it is usable by people with disabilities. This includes adherence to standards and guidelines like WCAG for web content.
What are some alternatives to "checking for accessibility"?
You can use alternatives like "assessing accessibility", "evaluating accessibility", or "verifying accessibility" depending on the context.
How can I "check for accessibility" on a website?
You can "check for accessibility" on a website by using automated tools, manual testing with assistive technologies (like screen readers), and following accessibility guidelines such as WCAG.
What are the benefits of "checking for accessibility"?
The benefits of "checking for accessibility" include improving usability for all users, complying with legal requirements, and expanding your audience to include people with disabilities.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested