Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
AK and MM checked the manuscript, provided comments on the manuscript and contributed to the discussion section.
We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments provided by Stephen M. Beard, who reviewed the manuscript, and the input by Adam Irving, who checked the manuscript for data consistency and accuracy.
We also thank Ms Karin Velbek, hospital library service at Horsens Hospital, who supported the literature search, and Ms Vivienne Krause, University of Witten/ Herdecke who checked the manuscript for English language.
Sassall checked the manuscript and made some minor corrections – "medical terminology, technical comments, that sort of thing" – but was otherwise happy with it.
SY and NK checked the manuscript.
YS proposed the original idea, WY wrote the paper under the guidance of CL and LX, WY and CL designed the experiment and provided all of the figures, and LX checked the manuscript and contributed to the rearrangement of the materials.
I gained valuable insights from a talk by Robert Lucas and from helpful materials that he furnished me, and from a discussion with Lynn Maddox and an e-mail exchange with Myron Scholes . Lee Lockwoodand Christian Opp carefully checked the manuscript for technical economic errors and in the process made valuable suggestions for improving the book.
JFV-C and VG checked the manuscript.
SO, SD, MY supported and checked the manuscript.
JS prepared the figures and checked the manuscript.
JS and VJ as supervisors have checked the manuscript and helped in the creation of content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com