Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
For example, databases from different sources can be checked for duplicate reactions, for reactions using the same starting material or yielding the same product.
The standardized canonical SMILES were then filtered for small or large compounds (100 Da < MW < 900 Da) and checked for duplicate ligand structures to ensure only one set of protein ligand pairs were retained.
The dataset was checked for duplicate entries.
The final 68 papers were checked for duplicate studies.
All food outlet data were again checked for duplicate records.
A blind evaluator must write down the answers, so they can be checked for duplicate responses (repeated words invalidate one of them).
Similar(52)
Both datasets were combined and checked for duplicates to a final list of 806 taste structures.
Both datasets were combined and checked for duplicates to a final list of 1760 fragrance molecule structures.
Then, all employed data sets were checked for duplicates and fingerprinted using the ECFP variant with a depth of four and a hash space size of 222 to minimize collisions.
Data was cleaned and checked for duplicates.
The sequences were aligned using ClustalX (ver. 1.81; [35]) and then checked for duplicates, gaps, ambiguous bases, pseudogenes and sequences which were shorter than the required 610 bases starting with 5'GCTATAATAACT.
More suggestions(18)
checked for duplications
checked for repeats
checked for overlaps
checked for overlapping
checked for fit
checked for duplication
checked for availability
checked for health
checked for corrosion
checked for relevance
checks for duplicate
checked for contamination
checked for viability
checked for validity
checked for correspondence
checked for surface
checked for plausibility
checked for reliability
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com