checked for distortions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "checked for distortions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are verifying or examining something for inaccuracies or alterations. Example: "The audio file was checked for distortions to ensure the quality of the recording."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

However, in studies with unbalanced disease groups the Self-management and insight and Positive and active engagement in life scales should be checked for distortions of MI.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Segregations were checked for distortion to the expected 1 1 ratio using a Chi2 test at a significance level of 0.05.

BMC Plant Biology

The data was checked for segregation distortion from 1 1 or 1 2 1 ratio using a χtest.

BMC Genomics

Patients are checked for postural distortion, palpatory tenderness, range of motion, and/or paraspinal thermometry that are used on a visit-by-visit basis [ 19, 20].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

First, raw DTI-images were visually checked for artifacts and then corrected for susceptibility-induced geometric distortions, subject motion and eddy current distortions using EDDY and TOPUP55.

Nature

and checked for errors.

BMC Veterinary Research

The Tigrigna version was again translated back to English to check for any inconsistencies or distortions in the meaning of words & concepts.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Check, check, check for Ms. Sandberg.

The New York Times

Checking for people, checking for possessions.

The New Yorker

Checking for pursuers.

The New York Times - Books

Check  for  passaging.

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When technical specifications or sensitive data are involved, always explicitly state the metrics used to determine what constitutes a "distortion". This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "checked for distortions" without specifying the type of distortion being checked. Vague usage can lead to misinterpretation and ineffective quality control.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "checked for distortions" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating an action performed on something to identify alterations or inaccuracies. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for describing a verification process.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

35%

Wiki

33%

News & Media

32%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "checked for distortions" is grammatically sound and serves to describe the act of verifying something for alterations or inaccuracies. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is usable in various contexts, primarily science, wiki, and news media. While the phrase is relatively rare, it's important to specify the type of distortion being checked to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "verified for inaccuracies" or "examined for flaws" can be used depending on the specific context. When using this phrase in technical or sensitive settings, define the metrics used to determine "distortion".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verified for inaccuracies

Emphasizes the act of confirming correctness and identifying errors.

examined for flaws

Highlights a detailed inspection to identify defects.

inspected for defects

Focuses on a formal review to find imperfections.

evaluated for anomalies

Suggests a process of judging for unusual or irregular features.

assessed for irregularities

Highlights the process of determining if something deviates from the norm.

screened for aberrations

Implies a filtering process to identify deviations from the standard.

tested for deformities

Focuses on assessing structural irregularities through testing.

audited for anomalies

Suggests a systematic review to find inconsistencies.

investigated for irregularities

Emphasizes a thorough inquiry to uncover deviations.

validated for errors

Highlights the confirmation process to ensure the absence of mistakes.

FAQs

How can I use "checked for distortions" in a sentence?

You can use "checked for distortions" to describe a process of verifying data or objects for inaccuracies. For example, "The audio recording was checked for distortions before broadcast."

What is a good alternative to "checked for distortions"?

Alternatives include "verified for inaccuracies", "examined for flaws", or "inspected for defects", depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "checked for distortions" or "verified for accuracy"?

While both phrases relate to quality control, "checked for distortions" implies looking for alterations or deformities, whereas "verified for accuracy" focuses on confirming correctness. The best choice depends on the nature of what you're assessing.

What kind of items or data can be "checked for distortions"?

The phrase can apply to various items or data, including audio recordings, images, statistical data, and physical objects, whenever there's a need to ensure they haven't been altered or corrupted.