Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
checked for comprehensiveness
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "checked for comprehensiveness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the evaluation of a document, report, or analysis to ensure that it covers all necessary aspects or information. Example: "Before finalizing the report, it was checked for comprehensiveness to ensure all relevant data was included."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
Both translations were synthesised and checked for comprehensiveness by a professional of the target health profession.
After a period of three month, the physician sends the claims data to the German association of statutory health insurance physicians (KBV) where they are checked for comprehensiveness and plausibility.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
AA/VS separately indexed (coded) six transcripts to check for comprehensiveness and consistency indexing.
Science
The claims are forwarded on a quarterly basis from the individual physician to the regional physicians' panel association, checked there for comprehensiveness and plausibility and then transferred to the insurances.
Science
and checked for errors.
Science
Check, check, check for Ms. Sandberg.
News & Media
Checking for pursuers.
News & Media
Check for passaging.
Check for pellet.
Science
Check for job completion.
Science
Check for other problems.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "checked for comprehensiveness", ensure the checking process involves a structured method to verify each aspect or component for complete coverage.
Common error
Avoid assuming shared knowledge when using the phrase; ensure that the criteria for "comprehensiveness" are explicitly defined to prevent misunderstandings about what aspects were checked.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "checked for comprehensiveness" functions as a verb phrase combined with a prepositional phrase. It indicates the action of verifying something to ensure it includes all necessary elements. Ludwig's examples confirm its use in academic and scientific contexts, relating to data and document verification.
Frequent in
Science
60%
News & Media
20%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "checked for comprehensiveness" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe the action of ensuring that something is complete and covers all necessary aspects. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's most frequently found in scientific and academic contexts. To enhance clarity, explicitly define the criteria for comprehensiveness. Alternatives such as "assessed for completeness" or "verified for thoroughness" can be used depending on the specific context. Overall, the phrase serves to assure completeness and accuracy in formal and technical settings.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
assessed for completeness
Replaces "checked" with "assessed", focusing on the evaluation of completeness rather than the act of checking.
verified for thoroughness
Uses "verified" instead of "checked", highlighting the confirmation of thoroughness.
evaluated for comprehensiveness
Substitutes "checked" with "evaluated", indicating a more formal assessment of comprehensiveness.
examined for completeness
Replaces "checked" with "examined", suggesting a detailed inspection for completeness.
reviewed for extensiveness
Uses "reviewed" in place of "checked", focusing on the broad scope or extent of the subject.
audited for full coverage
Substitutes "comprehensiveness" with "full coverage", emphasizing the completeness of the information covered in the document.
inspected for all-inclusiveness
Replaces "checked" with "inspected", and "comprehensiveness" with "all-inclusiveness", highlighting an examination for complete inclusion.
validated for exhaustiveness
Uses "validated" in place of "checked", emphasizing the confirmation of exhaustiveness.
ensured to be comprehensive
Shifts the focus to ensuring the quality of being comprehensive rather than directly checking it.
confirmed for overall scope
Emphasizes the confirmation of the general extent or range of something, rather than its completeness in detail.
FAQs
What does "checked for comprehensiveness" mean?
It means that something has been examined to ensure it includes all necessary elements or covers all relevant aspects completely.
How can I ensure a document is "checked for comprehensiveness" effectively?
Use a checklist that covers all the essential components or aspects that the document should include.
What are some alternatives to saying "checked for comprehensiveness"?
You can use alternatives like "assessed for completeness", "verified for thoroughness", or "evaluated for comprehensiveness".
In what contexts is it appropriate to say something was "checked for comprehensiveness"?
This phrase is suitable in contexts where documents, reports, analyses, or processes need to be complete, such as in scientific research, audits, or quality control.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested