Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(54)
Since when is it not journalists' job to check facts?
@JohnCFierce just a bad journalist who doesn't check facts or think logically.
We still make sure copy is readable, rewriting where necessary, and check facts.
"This pressure exacerbates groupthink as there is no time to check facts or consider other explanations.
You might be a journalist, wanting to check facts on a number of artists or exhibitions.
I did not check facts, or check out what he actually said".
"This is what happens when people are irresponsible and don't check facts".
A large majority of respondents weighed in with, yes, you moron, The Times should check facts and print the truth.
Similar(3)
The internet allows them access to a variety of sources and they can double-check facts without the pressures of time and workload that subeditors face.
And if you need an even bigger deterrent not to lie, the lawyers I spoke with said it's often perfectly legal and somewhat common, depending on the state, for employers to double-check facts like compensation with former employers, especially if you signed a form allowing this.
There are a lot of bloggers who do [check facts], but you have to be careful with the rumor mill, especially in the Web 2.0 space.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com