Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"cheat for" is not technically correct or usable in written English as it is missing an object.
The correct phrasing would be "cheat for something" or "cheat something." For example: "He was caught trying to cheat for an extra credit assignment on the final."
Exact(60)
It's kind of a cheat for theory, but I think it's both.
"People cheat for wealth and gold," he sang with a twang one recent Sunday.
I love my sport but I would never cheat for it".
How the cheat for variety-show hosts and soap-opera stars entered politics.
Or it can simply be a cheat for writers uninterested in scientific rigor.
Thus there would be very strong incentives to cheat, for example by caching some weapons-grade material just in case.
Yet a few extra points may be all the PRI needs, and will be tempted to cheat for.
If you're going to cheat: For long-term use, eating something besides raw food is a necessity.
There are other questions, too: how (not if) people are going to try to cheat, for example.
Others ("brazen liars") are willing to cheat for practically any non-zero incentive whereas still others ("honest individuals") do not cheat at all, even for large payoffs.
There are more temptations and pressure on athletes, coaches, officials and others to cheat for betting gains than at any other time in the past.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com