Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"cheap about" is not a grammatically correct phrase in written English.
It is possible that it could be used informally in spoken English, but it is not a commonly used phrase. A more natural and grammatically correct alternative would be "cheap in." For example: Incorrect: The store was cheap about the quality of their products. Correct: The store was cheap in regards to the quality of their products.
Exact(48)
Its cost is cheap, about 11 cents.
There are some things you should never be cheap about".
It's cheap (about two cents a minute within the United States), but it's not free.
Doctors in neighbouring Kayin state, home to the ethnic Karen people, say the proportion is similar there.Yaba is cheap (about $1.50 a tab) and readily available.
There's nothing cheap about it, either".
There is something a mite cheap about the Eliasson installation.
Similar(7)
They are not cheap -- about $60 or $70 each -- but I consider them an insurance policy.
One shocking reason is that they were cheap - about $250,000 each, a lot less than a new bomber.
It was not cheap -- about 8percentt of the cost of our package, not including airfare -- but it seemed like a bargain when the underwriters reimbursed him for most of the roughly $4,500 we had each paid upfront.
In the U.K. it is quite cheap -- about £200 -- but detailed searches and patent agent fees cost money, often taking the cost past £5000, and renewals can amount to hundreds of pounds per year.
They're not cheap -- about $13,000 each -- but Staller believes every village could have one.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com