Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In addition, Scambler et al. [ 87] described how a slight change in CHAT criteria to allow parents to endorse either of two critical items, improved CHAT sensitivity by 20%% while maintaining specificity of 100%% in a group of children with developmental disabilities.
Similar(59)
Screening tools include the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT), the Early Screening of Autistic Traits Questionnaire, and the First Year Inventory; initial data on M-CHAT and its predecessor CHAT on children aged 18 30 months suggests that it is best used in a clinical setting and that it has low sensitivity (many false-negatives) but good specificity (few false-positives).
Since Fz3 −/− mice die as neonates, the high sensitivity of the ChAT-IRES-Cre; R26iAP method recommended it for surveying late prenatal cholinergic axons.
The M-CHAT, with looser boundaries and greater sensitivity, is intended to flag even subtle cases.
The dramatic decline was almost entirely due to women leaving the services; which "coincided with increased awareness of and sensitivity to worrisome behaviour in chat rooms".
The dramatic decline was almost entirely due to women leaving the services; which "coincided with increased awareness of and sensitivity to worrisome behavior in chat rooms".
In the case of CHAT validity, the high-risk + medium-risk criterion improved sensitivity considerably (from 0.18 to 0.48) while keeping specificity high, i.e. 0.99 for the high-risk criterion and 0.87 for the high-risk + medium-risk criterion.
On Web sites and Internet chat rooms, testimonials praise the drug as everything from a personal growth tool to a means to enhance sexual sensitivity.
For instance, the CHAT-1 + CHAT-2 (second administration of CHAT after a high-risk result in CHAT-1) has an excellent specificity of 1.00 combined with a very poor sensitivity of 0.21 [ 62].
Examples: Ma et al. performed sensitivity analyses based on Bayesian and classical methods for analysing cluster RCTs with a binary outcome in the CHAT trial.
Great chat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com