charge him with doing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "charge him with doing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when assigning responsibility or accusing someone of a specific action or task. Example: "The committee decided to charge him with doing the necessary research for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"If they have something to charge him with, why didn't they do it two years ago?" she said, adding of the accusations.

The Guardian

The federal criminal affidavit does not charge him with espionage, nor does it say that any material passed contained classified information.

The New York Times

"But they charged him with fare evasion, and he didn't do that".

The New York Times

Speaking on the "Anderson Cooper 360" program, the juror identified as B37 said she wanted to find Zimmerman guilty of "not using his senses" but that "you can't charge him with anything because he didn't do anything unlawful".

Huffington Post

"We didn't have enough to charge him with a crime, and the parents didn't want to involve the children in court proceedings," Adams explained.

Huffington Post

He said he thinks that police intended to charge him with disorderly conduct, but he doesn't know why. District courts in Baltimore were closed Tuesday because of the state of emergency put in place.

The Washington Post

Cops weren't able to charge Heinrich for Scheierl's assault, as the statute of limitations had expired, but they did charge him with 25 child pornography counts.

Huffington Post

Barclay escorted Hines out but did not charge him with disorderly conduct.

The New Yorker

The indictment doesn't charge him with stealing any money with that information.

The Washington Post

But they did not charge him with any crimes related to his campaign interactions with Kilimnik.

The Washington Post

But the judges did not charge him with genocide, as the prosecutor had requested.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "charge him with doing", ensure that the action following "doing" is clearly defined and directly related to the accusation or responsibility being assigned. For example: "They charged him with doing irreparable harm to the environment".

Common error

Avoid using overly general terms after "doing" that do not specify the exact nature of the alleged action. For example, instead of "charge him with doing wrong", specify the wrongdoing: "charge him with doing fraud".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "charge him with doing" functions as a verb phrase followed by a prepositional phrase. It is used to express the act of formally accusing someone of a specific action or holding them responsible for it. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Academia

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "charge him with doing" is a grammatically correct and usable English expression that means to formally accuse someone of a specific action or hold them responsible. Ludwig AI validates this. While not exceedingly common, it's found in various contexts, including news reports, academic discussions, and formal communications. Alternative phrasing includes "accuse him of performing" or "hold him accountable for undertaking". When using this phrase, ensure that the action is clearly defined. Avoid vague language for clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accuse him of performing

Replaces "charge" with "accuse" and uses "performing" instead of "doing", emphasizing the act itself.

hold him responsible for doing

Focuses on the responsibility aspect, a bit more direct than the original phrase.

hold him accountable for undertaking

Focuses on accountability and replaces "doing" with "undertaking", highlighting the initiation of an activity.

implicate him in carrying out

Suggests involvement in the action, using "carrying out" to emphasize execution.

allege that he carried out

Emphasizes the claim that he performed the action, often used in legal or investigative contexts.

attribute the execution to him

Formally assigns the action to him, focusing on the completion or execution of the task.

ascribe the performance of it to him

Similar to attribute, but focuses on the 'performance' aspect and uses a more formal tone.

indict him for undertaking

Specifically refers to a formal accusation, typically in a legal setting, focusing on the activity.

pin the responsibility of doing on him

Emphasizes the act of assigning blame or duty for the action.

lay the blame for undertaking it on him

Directly places blame for the action onto the individual.

FAQs

How can I use "charge him with doing" in a sentence?

You can use "charge him with doing" to indicate that someone is being accused of or held responsible for a particular action. For example, "They will charge him with doing damage to public property".

What are some alternatives to "charge him with doing"?

Alternatives include "accuse him of performing", "hold him accountable for undertaking", or "allege that he carried out", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "charge him with doing" and "accuse him of doing"?

"Charge him with doing" typically implies a more formal accusation, often in a legal setting, while "accuse him of doing" is a more general term for stating that someone has done something wrong.

Is it correct to say "charge him to do" instead of "charge him with doing"?

While "charge him to do" might sound similar, it changes the meaning. "Charge him with doing" implies accusation or responsibility for an action, while "charge him to do" implies assigning a task or duty. For task assignment, use something like "task him with" or "assign him to" instead.