characterized to have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "characterized to have" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where one is describing the attributes or features of something, but the construction is awkward and not idiomatic. Example: "The species is characterized to have a unique adaptation to its environment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

39 human-written examples

Effectively, CCN1 and CCN6 have been characterized to have tumor promoting activity [62-64] [62-64]

Clinical and Translational Medicine

PTX-loaded FA-TPGS2K/HDP mixed micelles were characterized to have a small size distribution, high loading content and excellent pH-responsive drug release profiles.

Acta Biomaterialia

Overall, the precursor polymers, as well as the resultant alternating copolyimides were characterized to have relatively good properties suitable for applications in the fabrication of microelectronic devices.

Polymer

The supported H3PMo12O40/SM-CMK-3 catalyst was characterized to have high surface area (≈1000 m2/g) and relatively large pore volume (0.83 cm3/g).

Catalysis Today

A copolyester was characterized to have 91 mol% trimethylene terephthalate unit and 9 mol% ethylene terephthalate unit in a random sequence by using 13C NMR.

Polymer

Doxorubicin (DOX -loaded nanoparticles (NPs) were characterizeDOX -loaded unanoparticlesistributioNPshigh entrapment efficiency, good stability in plasma as were as a pH dependent drug release pattern.

Acta Biomaterialia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

21 human-written examples

Likewise, most, if not all tumours characterized to date, have defects in the p53 tumour suppressor pathway.

British Journal of Cancer

All monomeric linear mt genomes characterized to date have a single pair of TIR on both ends [ 5].

BMC Genomics

Only five of the seventeen superfamilies characterized to date have been found in plant genomes (CACTA, Mutator, PIF/Harbinger, hAT, Tc1/mariner) [ 4, 5].

BMC Genomics

No other DNA polymerase characterized to date has either an intrinsic ATPase activity or a similar autoregulatory mechanism.

eLife

Minor comments " are characterized extensively" → "have been characterized extensively" Author's response: Following the reviewer's suggestion, we haved changed " are characterized extensively" to "have been characterized extensively".

Biology Direct

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "characterized to have", opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "characterized by", "defined as having", or "known to have".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "characterized to have" in an attempt to sound more formal. Simpler phrasing such as "is known for" or "possesses" often provides more clarity and conciseness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "characterized to have" functions as a verb phrase used to describe the attributes or qualities of a subject. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this specific construction is not grammatically correct, and should be replaced by alternatives.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "characterized to have" is frequently encountered in scientific literature, but as highlighted by Ludwig, it is grammatically incorrect. A review of example sentences reveals that it appears primarily in science-related contexts, aiming to specify attributes or features. Although commonly used, it's best replaced with grammatically sound alternatives such as "characterized by", "defined as having", or "known to have", ensuring clarity and precision in writing. By favoring these alternatives, writers can avoid awkward phrasing while maintaining a formal tone. Ludwig's analysis underscores the importance of grammatical accuracy, even in technical writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

characterized by having

Emphasizes possession of a quality as a defining trait.

known to have

Highlights established knowledge about possessing a particular attribute.

identified as having

Focuses on the act of recognizing and classifying something based on its attributes.

described as having

Indicates how something is portrayed or represented with certain attributes.

defined by its possession of

Offers a formal and precise way to specify defining characteristics.

possessing the attribute of

Emphasizes the inherent quality or trait that something holds.

exhibiting the property of

Highlights the observable characteristics or behavior of something.

features include

Presents a list-like format to describe qualities or aspects

attributes consist of

Offers a way to outline characteristic qualities or features.

with properties including

Highlights specific properties among other features

FAQs

How can I rephrase the sentence using "characterized to have"?

Instead of "characterized to have", you can use alternatives such as "characterized by", "defined as having", or "known to have" depending on the context.

Is "characterized to have" grammatically correct?

The phrase "characterized to have" is not considered standard English. More grammatically sound options include "characterized by" or "defined as having".

What's the difference between "characterized to have" and "characterized by"?

"Characterized by" is the correct idiomatic expression to use. It means that something is notable for a particular quality. "Characterized to have" is an incorrect phrasing. For example, instead of saying, "The compound is characterized to have high reactivity", it should be, "The compound is characterized by high reactivity".

When is it appropriate to use "characterized to have"?

It's generally not appropriate to use "characterized to have" in formal writing. Instead, use more accepted phrases like "known to have", "defined as having", or "characterized by".