Suggestions(1)
Exact(30)
This work characterized and compared the properties of electrospun nanofibrous dressings of these polysaccharides.
This study characterized and compared the TIR-domain-containing protein repertoire of nine cnidarians in class Anthozoa.
We previously characterized and compared the microbial communities of nine biofilters in five commercial marine recirculating marine aquaculture systems by amplifying and sequencing the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (Huang et al. 2016).
Here, we characterized and compared the protein composition of ECM produced in vitro by bone marrow-derived MSC, adipose-derived MSC and neonatal fibroblasts from different donors, employing quantitative proteomic methods.
This study characterized and compared the composition (saplings and trees) and structure (gaps, foliage distribution, tree diameter and density, snags and coarse woody debris) of old-growth stands (OG), 12-year-old selection cuts (SC), and 28 33-year-old 28 33-year-old 28 33-year-oldsugar maple (Acer saccharum)-dominated northern hardwood stands.
Using classical statistical and geostatistical methods, we characterized and compared the spatial heterogeneities of STN and STP under different land use types (farmland, grassland, and shrubland).Concentrations of STN and STP were normally distributed with the exception of STP in grassland, and decreased in the order: farmland > grassland > shrubland.
Similar(30)
We characterize and compare the optimal mediation and arbitration procedures.
In this research, we characterize and compare the spatiotemporal patterns of travel demand and transit supply.
Experimental results of tests aimed at validating, characterizing, and comparing the proposed method on two different converter architectures are presented.
Raman microspectroscopy has been used to characterize and compare the molecular organization of skin substitutes with normal human skin.
Therefore, the objectives of our study were to characterize and compare the fecal microbiota of sables between wild and housed sables.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com