Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
From physicochemical characterization data, it was shown that the formation of CuO crystallites is favoured following the Cs content in Cs Cu/ZrO2 catalysts whereas cesium tends to hinder the formation of Co3O4 crystallites in Cs Co/ZrO2.
From these characterization data it is concluded that all the compounds are homogeneously and highly dispersed on the catalyst materials as there is no evidence for the presence of crystalline nanoparticles.
Similar(58)
Based on the characterization data mentioned above, it is evident that both Ni/GD and Fe/GD consist of only isolated Ni and Fe atoms, respectively.
Whenever variant characterization data are available in the literature, it is reported in the description field in "Sequence annotation (Features)", "Natural variant" (Fig. 2), in free text form.
It is interesting to observe that at various synchrotron radiation facilities single catalyst particle characterization tools are now becoming available making it possible to compare bulk characterization data with single catalyst particle analysis.
All data that support the findings of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information (including experimental procedures, compound characterization data).
It means that the fitting parameters have not been tested for a variety of characterization data or other models as well.
Some preliminary characterization data have been presented.
All experimental procedures, characterization data (NMR, MS, UV and HPLC) for compounds and additional data referenced in the manuscript.
The most common question raised in nanotoxicology is whether there is a minimum set of physical and chemical characterization data for nanomaterials that is required for publication.
Compounds 5(Br2), 7(Br4) and 8(Br4) were prepared using published procedures, as summarized in the Supplementary Section 1; all characterization data match those previously reported.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com