Sentence examples for characteristics at individual from inspiring English sources

Considering the insufficiency of CR analysis above, some studies have tried to identify crash characteristics at individual level, in an effort to predict crash risk on a real time basis [7, 8, 9].

An ecological study design, as presented in this and similar papers, has some known limitations in terms of its ability to provide reliable inferences about the population characteristics at individual level.

The dataset included major characteristics at individual level, such as age, gender, race, education and marital status.

As this study is exploratory in nature, we hypothesized that the ORU domains ratings would be influenced by certain provider personnel experiences and associated characteristics at individual level.

Descriptive statistics will be used to compare characteristics at individual and nursing home-levels in each group at baseline, accounting for the clustering effect in the former.

However, recently reported study showed that the inequality of smoking prevalence by age and education level have been increased, but the inequality of smoking prevalence by residence area using location quotient was not a difference after controlling the socio-economic characteristics at individual level [ 33].

Third, in our analyses, workload was considered a stable characteristic at individual GP level, i.e. some GPs are consistently busier than others.

Although group-level associations are informative and relevant for planning group-level interventions, associations with group-level characteristics cannot be assumed to represent associations with the same characteristics defined at individual level.

However, when the goal is to describe eye-movement characteristics at the individual level or the effect of individual specific characteristics on eye-movement patterns the effects of ignoring individual differences in the thresholds to determine fixations can be large.

Furthermore, the results for subgroups (e.g., younger and older patients, men and women) may be regarded relevant, if value for money is assessed based on patient characteristics or at individual level.

The comparison of KIM with the population-based survey is valid for the prevalence estimates at the group level, but the study did not focus on test characteristics (sensitivity/specificity) at individual level.