Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
The performance of the rectangular channel is better, while that of trapezoidal channel is poor compared to the rectangular channel design.
It seems that the only crime an author can commit on the other side of the Channel is poor writing – although you can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style.
When the source to relay channel is poor, there will be decoding errors at the destination.
Specially, the delay of the proposed ODM-CM-WSN scheme is about 30 s and can improve the real-time performance when the channel is poor.
However, the channel is poor due to the large distance at this instance, and thus the transmission success rate is low.
For instance, if a user's channel is poor at the beginning of a time window, should the system allocate resources for this user or should it wait to see if the user's channel improves later in the time window?
Similar(53)
While the overall sequence identity of Kv and TRP channels is poor, the S4 S5 linker region is surprisingly similar between TRPCs and Kv channels.
It is evident that if we spend much power in the current epoch and the conditions of the wireless channels are poor, we may be missing the opportunity to use better this energy in the near future when the channel conditions improve.
Fortunately, the decoder performance is virtually unaffected by the accuracy of the SR channel estimate when the RD channel quality is poor.
We point out that the parameters of the source-destination and relay-destination channels can be accurately estimated but that inevitably the source-relay channel estimate is poor when the instantaneous SNR on the relay-destination channel is low; however, in this case, the decoder performance is not affected by the inaccurate source-relay channel estimate.
For example, for TM 001 channel 3 is the best quality channel and has a data rate of 5.39 kbps, whereas channel 2 is poor quality with data rate of 4.17 kbps for TM 010.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com