Sentence examples for changing the prevalence from inspiring English sources

Changing the prevalence of diseases did not change the percentage of positive tests.

In this paper we present a model which links morbidity and disability and, with the use of multiple survey and epidemiological data sources, provide estimates of the long-term reduction in chronic disability that would result from changing the prevalence of specific chronic diseases by the control of major risk factors.

If the ILI causing false-positive diagnosis is another influenza strain, antiviral usage may influence the dynamics of this non-pandemic influenza, changing the prevalence of non-pandemic ILI.

Changing the prevalence is important because it affects the proportion of true and false positives, and therefore the net benefit.

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of changing the length of the prevalence period on the observed incidence and misclassification of these conditions.

In this study, we sought to understand how changing the duration of the prevalence period, and specifically shortening it from a "gold standard" of 36 months, would affect the incidence estimates for 12 chronic and acute conditions common among the elderly.

However, to the extent that diagnostic work-up for cancer begins prior to diagnosis, and that this results in increased detection of new conditions, changing the point at which the prevalence period ends and the incidence period begins could affect the incidence rates and the amount of misclassification.

Furthermore, investigations in recent years have shown international travel as a possible means of spreading ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL- Ent), mainly ESBL- Ec, from high- to low-prevalence countries through asymptomatic travellers [ 8– 13], thereby increasing the local prevalence and changing the local epidemiology with the import of non-autochthonous ESBL- Ent [ 14].

The framework assumes that the intervention (Bahia Azul program) mediated its effect on the outcome (parasite prevalence) by changing the distribution of mediating variables such as neighborhood infrastructure (increasing sewerage coverage and improvements in other environmental variables), household living conditions, and hygiene behavior.

Figure 4 illustrates how the cutpoints on the MHI-5 and the MCS vary with GHQ-12 case prevalence (the GHQ-12 case prevalence was varied by changing the cutpoint on the GHQ-12).

In situation 3, confounding was increased by changing both the prevalences of the exposure and the outcome, achieving an increase from 4%to25%5%.