Social innovations that aim to be transformative in the sense that they have the goal to be system changing (rather than incremental) can be analyzed along the heuristics of the MLP.
You can annoy the heck out of them, but they won't change unless they want to, so it's more effective to convince them of the benefits of changing rather than just constantly criticizing them.
She favors changing, rather than eliminating, the marriage penalty and estate taxes, to benefit lower-income people.
We therefore focused on the activity 'in between', the period of implementing EHR during which things were changing, rather than some predicted state of achieved change.
Our approach, in contrast, became more and more one that focused on the activity 'in between'; the period during which things (and people, and teams) were changing, rather than some end state of achieved and stabilized change.
Beyond that, the emphasis of conservatism after the 60's was on changing rather than on preserving the status quo.
If only men, and the public gaze, could judge women for their total capacity for thinking, feeling, and changing, rather than for the way they fulfill the fantasies projected onto them.
Activity systems have multiple determinants and are constantly changing rather than being homogenous and stable.
This suggests that the segregation mechanisms in question are more susceptible to spectral than temporal perturbations (as in experiments 3, and 6 below) but can still integrate over dynamically changing, rather than fixed, figure components.
