changes was noted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "changes was noted" is not correct in English.
It should be "changes were noted." You can use the corrected phrase when documenting observations or findings, particularly in reports or analyses. Example: "In the latest review, several changes were noted in the project's timeline and budget."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

In addition, a positive psychological benefit (25%% of the cases), as well as dental changes, was noted.

Progress in Orthodontics

The presence of specific degenerative changes was noted, in particular any evidence of loose fibrous connective tissue, cystic appearance of the tissue, occurrence of granular substance, myxoid appearance of the tissue, chondroid metaplasia, calcium pyrophosphate (CPPD) crystals and mucinous degeneration.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Reversal of these changes was noted for bacteria recovered from the intestine, where transcripts for qseF and fis and putative virulence factors AidA15, TerC and Ent/EspL2 were significantly increased, and transcripts for AIDA48, Iha, UreC, Efa1A, Efa1B, ToxB, EhxA, StcE, NleA and NleB were expressed at high levels.

Plosone

The presence of epithelial proliferative changes was noted.

Breast Cancer Research

A large intervariability in absolute BV values and in BV changes was noted in the intratumoral region.

British Journal of Cancer

Miracidial shape was recorded as normal, tadpole, or dumbbell, and the time of any changes was noted.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Minimal islet cell changes were noted.

Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology

As the weeks passed, changes were noted.

The New Yorker

Similar changes were noted for total magnesium concentrations.

The Journal of Pediatrics

Insignificant, but highly variable, changes were noted echocardiographically.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

In groups 1 and 2, minimal histologic changes were noted.

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always ensure subject-verb agreement; use "changes were noted" instead of "changes was noted".

Common error

Be mindful of subject-verb agreement. With plural subjects like "changes", use the plural verb form "were" rather than the singular "was". This correction ensures grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "changes was noted" functions as a passive voice construction where an observation about alterations or modifications is communicated. However, due to grammatical error, the phrase is not considered a standard form. Ludwig AI signals this issue, pointing out the incorrect verb conjugation.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

11%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "changes was noted" appears in various contexts, particularly within scientific literature and news media, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "changes were noted", ensuring subject-verb agreement. Ludwig AI highlights this grammatical issue, underscoring the importance of using the plural verb "were" with the plural subject "changes". To avoid this error, writers should be vigilant about subject-verb agreement or consider using alternative phrases like "changes were observed" or "changes were detected" for clarity and accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

changes were observed

Replaces "noted" with "observed", maintaining a similar meaning but with proper grammar.

changes were detected

Replaces "noted" with "detected", implying the changes were found through examination.

changes were identified

Replaces "noted" with "identified", suggesting the changes were recognized and specified.

changes were recorded

Replaces "noted" with "recorded", indicating the changes were documented.

changes were registered

Replaces "noted" with "registered", highlighting that changes were formally documented or recognized.

changes were documented

Replaces "noted" with "documented", emphasizing the recording of changes for future reference.

changes have been noted

Uses the present perfect tense to indicate that changes were noted and are relevant now, while correcting the grammar.

the changes were apparent

Shifts focus to the visibility of the changes rather than the act of noting them, while also correcting the grammar.

the changes were noticeable

Similar to 'apparent', but emphasizes the ease with which changes could be observed, while also correcting the grammar.

a change was noted

Uses the singular form, implying a single specific change was observed, and corrects the grammar.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "changes was noted"?

The grammatically correct way to phrase this is "changes were noted". The verb must agree with the plural subject "changes".

Is "changes was noted" grammatically correct?

No, "changes was noted" is grammatically incorrect. The plural subject "changes" requires the plural verb "were", so the correct phrase is "changes were noted".

What can I say instead of "changes was noted"?

You can use alternatives like "changes were observed", "changes were detected", or "changes were identified".

What's the difference between "changes was noted" and "changes were noted"?

"Changes was noted" is grammatically incorrect due to subject-verb disagreement. "Changes were noted" is the correct form, where the plural verb "were" agrees with the plural subject "changes".