"changes in respect of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to refer to changes that are related to or in relation to something. This phrase is often used in more formal or technical writing. Example: "The company has seen significant changes in respect of its financial status over the past year." In this sentence, "changes in respect of" is used to indicate that the financial status of the company has undergone changes or has been affected in some way.
And further, when a thing is increased or decreased its magnitude changes in respect of place.
Materials when reduced down to 1 100 nm (1 100×10−9 m) in their dimension show drastic changes in respect of their physical, chemical, optical, magnetic, mechanical and electrical properties.
Classification was carried out based on gene expression changes in respect of control subjects, regardless of whether these were up or downregulated, or exposure concentrations.
It seems unlikely that much will change in respect of the first, which makes good management all the more important.
Past and future are not real predicates of events in this view; and change in respect of them is not a genuine change.
He identified what he believes needs to change in respect of: maintaining a universal service, integrated care, waiting times, spending and competition.
But condensation and rarefaction are nothing more than combination and separation, processes in accordance with which substances are said to become and perish: and in being combined and separated things must change in respect of place.
"Forgive me for being cynical, but the government is trying to win a political battle by announcing scrapping the cuts, but in effect they will still achieve what they wanted unless the criteria for the ATS funding is changed in respect of the new landscape," he said.
He says "nothing has changed" in respect of the withdrawal agreement.
These atoms were indivisible and uniform, of various sizes and shapes, and capable only of change in respect of position and motion, but not intrinsic qualities.
As with many other issues in philosophy of chemistry, the discussion of atomism begins with Aristotle, who attacked the coherence of the notion and disputed explanations supposedly built on the idea of indivisible constituents of matter capable only of change in respect of position and motion, but not intrinsic qualities.
