The phrase "changes in control" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to any shifts or adjustments in power or authority within a company or organization. For example: - "The recent merger between the two companies resulted in significant changes in control, with the CEO of the acquiring company now leading the newly formed entity." - "In times of crisis, there tends to be a lot of turnover and changes in control within the government." - "The changes in control at the top level of management have brought about a new direction for the company's strategy."
High performance systems, like the F-16, when pushed to their limits encounter qualitative changes in control system properties like loss of controllability or observability.
Such special shares give the government a veto over changes in control of the companies or otherwise grant special influence over the way the companies are run.
Southern won a preliminary injunction blocking E.ON, the largest utility in Germany, from selling its 49 perecent stake in Bewag to HEW, based on its rights under German law as a major shareholder to be consulted about changes in control.
His group opposed earlier proposals because they would continue to allow "golden shares," special shares usually held by governments that confer veto power over major decisions like changes in control of a company.
"These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management," the company wrote in its prospectus.
Our own research group is using hypnosis to simulate changes in control of the body, in part to examine whether similar brain processes are involved both in hypnosis and a condition called conversion disorder – where what seem to be neurological symptoms appear, like paralysis or blindness, despite there being no damage to the nervous system that could explain them.
However, due to unexpected changes in control group conditions, both groups increased episodic pain assessment.
"In theory, change-in-control provisions make sense," said Tim Ranzetta, the president of Equilar.
Hoping to avoid a challenge from Johnson & Johnson over the change-in-control clause, Merck devised an unusual strategy called a reverse-merger agreement.
Yet 37% of companies have change-in-control provisions with so-called single triggers.
The reason: to avoid triggering a change-in-control clause in a deal between Schering and Johnson & Johnson.
